Academic Excellence Indicator System(AEIS) 2007-08
Annual Report and Public Hearing
North Forest ISD
January 12, 2009
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS)
Comprehensive reporting system defined by statute

Published annually since 1990-91

Gives parents and community a snapshot of
District/Campus Performance (Section I of AEIS Report)
District/Campus Profile (Section II of AEIS Report)

Contains all data used to determine District/Campus accountability ratings

Uses data collected through:
State data reporting system (PEIMS)
Student assessment system
AEIS Reports(Overview – Three Sections)

District/Campus 2008 Performance

District Campus Profiles

District/Campus 2008 Gold Performance Acknowledgments


Section I: District/Campus Performance

Data for all indicators used to determine accountability ratings
Spring 2008 TAKS performance
Spring 2008 TAKS-Acc Group 1 performance
Completion Rate I for class of 2007
2006-07 Annual Dropout Rate for grades 7 and 8

Disaggregated data by grade level

Data for indicators that are scheduled to be included in future accountability
Accountability Preview for 2009
College-Ready Graduates
AEIS Reports(Overview – Three Sections)
Section II: District/Campus Profile

Demographic data about students and staff

Program information

Financial information
District/Campus 2008 Gold Performance Acknowledgments
Section III
Section I


District/Campus 2008 Performance
AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance)
District/Campus performance indicators include:

TAKS performance – Spring 2008

“Met Standard” by grade, subject, and student group

Comparison to 2007 performance

Comparison to State and Region performance

Achieved Commended Performance (~90% of the items correct)
AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance)
District/Campus performance indicators include:

TAKS performance – Spring 2008

Accountability Measure: “Met Standard” – Sum of All Grades Tested (3-11) (or all grades tested at campus):
By subject
Reading/ELA, Math, Writing, Science, Social Studies
By student group
All Students, African American, Hispanic, White, Economically Disadvantaged
AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance)
District/Campus performance indicators include:

TAKS Met 2009 Standard - PREVIEW

2009 preview at Panel Recommendation

“Met Standard” by grade, subject, and student group
Analyzes 2008 Grade 8 Science at Panel Recommendation (rather than 1 SEM below Panel Recommendation)

Comparison to State and Region performance
AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance)
District/Campus performance indicators include:

TAKS/TAKS-Acc (Group 1) Participation Rates
Sum of all grades by student group

TAKS Exit-Level Cumulative Pass Rate

Progress of Prior Year TAKS Failers

Student Success Initiative Results

AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance)
District/Campus performance indicators include:

Attendance Rate

Annual Dropout Rate (2006-07)
Grades 7-8 [Standard Accountability Measure]
Grades 7-12 [Alternative Accountability Measure]
Grades 9-12

Completion Rate II
Class of 2007 (with GED) [Alternative Accountability Measure]

Completion Rate I
Class of 2007 (without GED) [Standard Accountability Measure]
AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance)
District/Campus performance indicators include:

Advanced Courses/Dual Enrollment
Recommended High School Program (RHSP)/Distinguished Achievement Program (DAP) Graduates
AP/IB Results
Texas Success Initiative – Higher Education Readiness Component (HERC)
SAT/ACT Results
College-Ready Graduates (Class of 2007)
Scheduled future accountability indicator
AEIS Key Issues for 2007-08
Implementation of NCES definition of dropout impacted the following accountability indicators in 2006-07:
Grade 7-8 dropout rate [Standard Accountability Measure]
Grade 7-12 dropout rate [Alternative Accountability Measure]
Completion Rate I [Standard Accountability Measure]
Completion Rate II [Alternative Accountability Measure]

School Leaver Provision for 2007-08
Dropout rate or completion rate cannot be the cause of a lowered district/campus rating
AEIS Key Issues for 2007-08
TAKS Met 2009 Standard – Preview of 2009
Includes Science Grade 8 at Panel Recommendation
Includes TAKS-Acc (Group 1) results from 2008

College-Ready Graduates – Preview of 2010
High school graduates who:
Met HERC standard on Exit Level ELA/Math; OR
Scored >=500 on SAT Reading/Math and >=1070 Total; OR
Scored >= 19 on ACT English/Math and >=23 Composite

English Language Learners Progress Measure – Preview of 2010
Appendix H to 2007-08 AEIS Glossary
AEIS: 2008 Accountability Standards
AEIS: 2008 Accountability Standards
Annual Dropout Rate (Grades 7-8)

Final Decision: Standards by Accountability Year (school year of dropout in parentheses)
AEIS: 2008 Accountability Standards
Completion Rate (HS)
Grades 9-12 (2003-04 Freshman Class)
Final Decision: Standards by Accountability Year (freshman year of cohort in parentheses)
2008 Accountability Ratings forNorth Forest ISD
District: Academically Acceptable

Fonwood Elementary: Academically Acceptable

Hilliard Elementary: Academically Acceptable

Lakewood Elementary: Recognized

W. E. Rogers Elementary: Academically Acceptable

Shadydale Elementary: Recognized

Thurgood Marshall Elementary: Not Rated

Tidwell Elementary: Recognized


2008 Accountability Ratings forNorth Forest ISD
B. C. Elmore Middle: Recognized
R. E. Kirby Middle: Academically Acceptable
Oak Village Middle: Academically Acceptable

Forest Brook HS: Unacceptable
Smiley HS: Unacceptable

The Learning Academy: Not Rated
2008 TAKS Performance Sum of All Grades Tested - 2008 Accountability Indicator
2008 TAKS Performance Reading/English Language Arts
2008 TAKS Performance Writing
2008 TAKS Performance Mathematics
2008 TAKS Performance Science - 8th Grade at Panel Recommendation
2008 TAKS Performance Social Studies
TAKS Met 2009 StandardSum of All Grades Tested - 2010 Accountability Indicator Preview
2006-07 Attendance
2006-07 Attendance
2006-07 Attendance
2006-07 Attendance
2006-07 Annual Dropout Rate (Gr. 7-8)
2006-07 Annual Dropout Rate (Gr. 7-12)(2008 Alternative Education Accountability Indicator)
2006-07 Annual Dropout Rate (Gr. 9-12)(Report Only)
Completion Rate I(2008 Accountability Indicator)
Completion Rate IClass of 2007 (Longitudinal)
Additional Indicators:College Readiness Indicators for High School Allotment
Percent of high school students completing an Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment:
3.8%

Percent of 2007 graduates completing the RHSP/DAP:
81.8%

AP and IB examination results
Tested: 5.4%
Examinees >= criterion: 9.8%
Scores >= criterion: 13.6%
Additional Indicators(2008 11th Graders Meeting HERC vs. Passing TAKS: ELA)
Additional Indicators(2008 11th Graders Meeting HERC vs. Passing TAKS: Math)
Additional Indicators2007 College-Ready Graduates ELA – Preview
Additional Indicators2007 College-Ready Graduates Math – Preview
Additional Indicators2007 College-Ready Graduates Both Subjects – Preview
Additional Indicators
SAT/ACT Results
Tested:
All Students: 76.1%
Af. Amer.: 77.6%
Hispanic: 64.3%
White: NA
Eco. Dis.: NA

At/Above Criterion
All Students: 0.6%
Af. Amer.: 0.6%
Hispanic: 0.0%
White: NA
Eco. Dis.: NA
Section II
District/Campus Profile



AEIS Report
Section II: District/Campus Profile

Demographic data about students and staff

Program Information

Financial Information
AEIS Reports(Section II - Profile)
Student Information
By grade
Ethnicity
Graduates
Retention rates
Class size

AEIS Reports(Section II - Profile)
Staff Information
Professional staff
Educational aides/auxiliary staff
Ethnicity and gender
Degrees held
Experience
Average teacher salary
Turnover rate for teachers

Financial Information
Tax information
Revenues
Expenditures
Student Information
Student Information
Student Information
District/Campus Profiles
Percentage of Teachers by Program
Campus Performance Objectives
Campus Improvement Plans are based on the AEIS

Performance Objectives are approved by the Board of Trustees

Data from the AEIS gives direction for the development of performance objectives that are low in relation to the accountability standards
Adequately Yearly Progress (AYP)Federal Accountability 2007-08
Measures used to determine AYP
Adequate Yearly ProgressDetermining “Performance”
NCLB allows each State to define “Proficiency”

BUT: NCLB requires that all students be held to the same high standards of academic achievement


All 3rd graders held to the same 3rd grade standard
All 4th graders held to the same 4th grade standard
Etc.
Texas AYP Standards for Performance (through Spring 2014)
2008 AYP Status for North Forest ISD
District: Missed AYP
Fonwood: Met AYP
Hilliard: Met AYP – appeal
Lakewood: Met AYP
Rogers: Met AYP
Shadydale: Met AYP
Elmore MS: Missed AYP
Kirby MS: Missed AYP
Oak Village MS: Missed AYP
Forest Brook HS: Missed AYP
Smiley HS: Missed AYP




Section III
District/Campus 2008 Gold Performance Acknowledgments




Violent and Criminal Incidents
Texas statute (TEC 39.053) requires every district to publish an annual report on violent and criminal incidents at campuses in the district

The report must include:
Number, rate and type of incidents
Information concerning school violence prevention and intervention policies and procedures used by the district
Findings that result from Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act
Violent and Criminal Incidents
Texas statute (TEC 39.053) requires every district to publish an annual report on violent and criminal incidents at campuses in the district

The report must include:
Number, rate and type of incidents
Information concerning school violence prevention and intervention policies and procedures used by the district
Findings that result from Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act
Number & Type of Incidents
Prevention & Interventions
Character Education Program – Project Wisdom
Student Code of Conduct
Pilot program at the high school – Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS)


Accessing the AEIS Report
Public Hearing – January 12, 2009

Where the report is available
TEA Website – www.tea.state.tx.us
District website – www.nfisd.org/
Campus Libraries or Offices